Good News About the Coming of Messiah

 

        From the very inception of sorrow into this world, from the very conception of sin on our planet, a Remedy was provided.  A  Saviour was promised. 


        This "Messiah" or "Anointed One" [Greek christos, Christ] has been awaited by mankind and specifically by the Jews for millennia.  From that first promise in Eden all the way down through the Scriptures, God gave details of his coming and promises of how he would remedy the effects of sin and heal and restore everything to the way it once was.  He would secure the universe from apostasy and defection for the rest of eternity.


            In order to do this, the Messiah would have to clearly answer and forever settle 3 pressing questions in the Great Controversy:


            1. Had God told the truth when He said sin results in death? 

          2. Is God the One who does the killing?

          3. What happens if we misunderstand God's role in the death of the sinner, and obey from fear?


        Who could possibly accomplish such a monumental task?  How would He do it?  Did God fulfill His promise by sending Him at the right time and place foretold? 

 


UNTO YOU A  SAVIOUR


1. What did God do when mankind chose to believe the enemy's lies and rebel? 

Genesis 3:15

Note:  God could have let Adam and Eve suffer the natural consequences of their act, and they would have died.  Instead, he promised that he would send someone to save them. 


2. Was this coming Saviour going to be an ordinary baby?

Isaiah 9:6  

Note: Try to imagine it: the infinite Creator of the universe decided to leave Heaven and become a helpless baby! 


3. Why didn't God use force or a show of power to win the war? 

Zechariah 4:6

Note: The flood was an act of great power—how long did the effect last?  God is infinite in might and power.  Even the Devil acknowledges that (James 2:19).  He created the vast universe by merely speaking!  Mighty angels cover their faces in reverence for the Almighty. 


            But that which God wants most—love and respect, freely given, cannot be achieved by force or fear.  This is why he has told us that he will not win the war with might or power, but with the gentle way his Spirit of love and truth works. 


            In the flood, God showed that the use of force would not work to restore peace to the universe—the obedience that results from fear produces the character of a rebel.


4.  What was God's purpose in sending Jesus?

Ephesians 2:11-16

Luke 19:10


5.  How did Jesus accomplish this work?

John 17:4,6

2 Corinthians 5:19-21

Note: Only by revealing the truth about God—demonstrating that God was an altogether different Person than Satan had made him out to be—could Jesus set us right and keep us right for eternity.

 

6.  How far was Jesus willing to go in saving us?

Philippians 2:8

Isaiah 53:2-13

2 Corinthians 5:21

Note: He was willing to live a life of hardship and be rejected; not only did he consent to die, but to die a cruel and unique death.  The Sinless One was willing to suffer the consequences for our sins. 


8.  God had warned Adam and Eve that if they ate of the tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, they would die (Genesis 2:16,17, Romans 6:23).  Satan told them that sin would not result in death, but rather benefit them (Genesis 3:4,5).  Why didn't they die, as God had said?  Was the Serpent right after all?

Revelation 13:8

Romans 3:25 (GNB)

Hebrews 2:9

Note: In outward appearance, it seemed as though God had not told the truth, when sinners did not die as he had warned.  Christians have tried to explain that Adam and Eve did die that day, "spiritually," or that they "began to die."  But the Hebrew idiom "dying you will die" does not imply a process, but a certainty.  They should have died immediately when they separated themselves from God, the Source of all life.

          The death with which we are all so familiar with, the "first death," is not the death God was speaking of in the Garden of Eden.  This death is called only a "sleep" by God, an interruption of life.  Good men and even innocent babies die this death.  Only One has ever died the awful death that results from separation from God—Jesus Christ.  Jesus is called "the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world" because he immediately stepped in and interrupted the death of Adam and Eve, giving them "artificial life support."  Had God let Adam and Eve die, it would have proven Satan a liar.  But God did not ask any of us to prove the truthfulness of his words that sin results in death (even though we deserved it!); he himself suffered the consequences of our sins.  Jesus proved that yes, sin does result in death. 


9.  Why didn't he just let Satan die the death that results from sin?

John 3:16

I Timothy 6:15-16

(John 10:17-18)

Note: The deaths of Satan or Adam and Eve would have answered question #1.  But how could the observing universe know that God was not the One who had taken their lives? 


            No one can take God's life from him.  When Jesus died, it was clear to the onlooking universe that he was laying down his life of himself.  Thus he answered question #2—the death that results from sin in not at the hands of our loving heavenly Father. 


            Jesus came to show us what God is like; he spent most of his time healing, not preaching.  Good doctors do not kill their dying patients; neither does our Father/Physician kill his sick children. 


10. In the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus fell dying to the ground, and no one had laid a finger on him; he was dying the death of the sinner, separated from the Father.  What did God do?

Luke 22:43

Note: Galatians 4:4 says Jesus came at the right time.  Why would God choose this particular time?  Many would answer that it was because of the wickedness of the world at the time.  If God wanted to choose a time for its wickedness, he could have come thousands of years before—during the time of Noah (Genesis 6:5).

          The people of Israel had for centuries had problems with worshipping idols, breaking the Sabbath, failing to tithe, and general disobedience.  Yet when Jesus came, they were, to all appearances, the most cautious Sabbath-keeping, tithe-paying, Bible-quoting, God-fearing people in history.


            They obeyed everything God said because they were afraid of him.  But they didn't really know God or even like him, because when he came, they said he was demon-possessed, and they killed him. 


            If Jesus had died in the Garden, question #2 would have been clearly answered before the universe.  But God strengthened his Son to go to the cross and, yes, be tortured and killed, but not by God—but by people who obeyed God not because they knew and loved him, but because they feared him. 


            Jesus secured the universe for eternity by answering question #3—if you obey God for the wrong reason, you will end up hating him and rebel.


IT TOOK THEM 70 WEEKS


        At the beginning of his ministry, Jesus publicly announced to the people, "The time is fulfilled."  (Mark 1:15).  What was he referring to? 


            We will now study a remarkable time-prophecy given to Daniel.  Written over 600 years before Jesus' birth, it foretells the time of his baptism, crucifixion, and the time when the gospel would go out to the gentile world.  "When the fullness of time was come, God sent forth His Son."  Galatians 4:4

 

11.  What happened when Daniel was praying? 

Daniel 9:20,21


12.  What did the angel tell Daniel to consider and understand?

Daniel 9:22-27


13.  What does a "day" represent in prophecy?

Ezekiel 4:6

Numbers 14:34

Note: If we follow the rule of making Scripture its own interpreter, a day in symbolic prophecy represents one literal year. 


14. How many years specially pertained to the Jewish people?

Verse 24

Note: The Hebrew word translated, "determined" (KJV) literally means "cut-off" or "set aside."   70 years were "set aside" as the time it would take the Jewish people as a nation to decide whether or not to be a part of God's plans to save the world.

 

          God did not arbitrarily set up a "deadline."  Looking into the future, he announced that within 70 years the Jewish nation would reject the Messiah.


15.  When did the angel say that the 70 weeks were to begin? 

Daniel 9:25

Note: There were 3 historic decrees issued by Persian kings for the restoration of the Jews to their homeland (Ezra 6:14).  The decree of Cyrus (536 B.C.) pertained only to the temple; the decree of Darius (519 B.C.) provided for the continuation of that work, hindered by Smerdis.  But the decree of Artaxerxes in the autumn of 457 BC restored the full Jewish government, making provision for the enforcement of their laws.  This last decree, therefore, is the one from which we reckon the 70 weeks. 


16. What time period is mentioned in re-building the wall and restoring the city?

verse 25

 

17.  What was to happen at the end of the remaining sixty-two weeks?  (7+62=69 weeks/years) 

Verse 25

Note: 69 weeks is 483 years.  From the decree of Artaxerxes, 483 years extend to the Autumn of AD 27.  At that time, this prophecy was fulfilled. According to verse 24, the "Most Holy" would be anointed within the 70 week prophecy.  (Anointing was part of the inauguration ceremony of priests and kings in Bible times, and marked the official commencement of their work.) 


            "Messiah" is the Hebrew word which means "Anointed one".  This word is translated into the Greek word from which we get the word "Christ"  (John 1:41).  In the autumn of A.D. 27 Christ was baptized by John and received the anointing of the Holy Spirit.  The apostle Peter testifies that "God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the holy Ghost and with power." (Acts 10:38).  The Saviour Himself declared shortly after this, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor."  (Luke 4:18).  After His baptism, He went into Galilee, "preaching the gospel of the Kingdom of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled."  (Mark 1:14-15).       


18. At the end of the 69 weeks, one week yet remained.  What was to be done in that week? 

Daniel 9:26,27

 

        a) He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week

        b) Messiah will be cut off

        c) He shall cause the sacrifices to cease


Let's analyze how these three things were fulfilled:

 

        a) "He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week" Jewish National Exclusivity Ends—A.D. 34


                        This week is the last one of the seventy; it was the last seven years of the period allotted especially to the Jewish nation.  During this time, extending from A.D. 27 to A.D. 34, Christ, at first in person and afterward by his disciples, extended the gospel invitation especially to the Jews.  As the apostles went forth with the good news about the kingdom, the Saviour's direction was, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."  Matthew 10:5-6


        b) "Messiah cut off in the midst of the week"- A.D.31


                   In A.D. 31, 3½ years after his baptism, our Lord was "cut off; but not for himself", in the middle of the 70th week. 


        c) "He shall cause the sacrifice and oblation (offering) to cease"


                The sacrificial services were only for the purpose of representing the future sacrifice of Christ.  When the fulfillment of the symbols came, there was no longer any purpose for the sacrifices or the Temple services.  At the moment Christ died, the temple veil was torn in half by an unseen hand (Matthew 27:51).  By this supernatural gesture, God indicated that the "sacrifice and oblation" of the Old Testament Sanctuary Service had ceased.

 

 

Acts 7:54-60: The martyrdom of Stephen


                      A far deeper significance is attached to the stoning of Stephen than may appear to a casual reading of the story.  While multitudes of the Jewish people (including many of the priests) had accepted Christ and believers were almost all Jewish at that time, by the actions of the Jewish Sanhedrin (the responsible Jewish religious leaders) the nation sealed its formal rejection of the gospel by the martyrdom of Stephen and the persecution of the followers of Christ.

 

          This precipitated an expansion in the proclamation of the Gospel.  Up till that time, the Gospel labour was almost exclusively for Jewish people.  At that time, this abruptly ceased, and Jewish Christian witnesses, forced to flee from Jerusalem by the sudden outburst of savage persecution, "went everywhere preaching the word."


                      Samaritans and the Ethiopian eunuch were the first-fruits from among non-Jews (Acts 8:1,4,5,27,29)  Paul, the future apostle of the gentiles, was converted one year later, and was commissioned by Christ to carry the glad tidings "far hence unto the gentiles."  (Acts 22:21).


 

CONCLUSION


        "Phillip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, 'We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write: Jesus of Nazareth.'"   John 1:45

 

        Notice in verse 26 of Daniel 9, it is stated that Jesus was cut off, but NOT FOR HIMSELF.  He did it for you and for me, that we might have eternal life. 

 

        In light of Jesus' matchless love for you, do you want to accept his free gift of life to you, and follow him?

 

My response to Christ is:______________________________

 

 

 

The Origins of Futurism


            In 1233 AD Pope Gregory IX formally entrusted to the recently formed Dominican Order a systematic and ubiquitous enquiry (inquisito) into the beliefs of the flocks, for the detection and punishment of those whose opinions differed from the doctrines of the church.  Thus was born the Inquisition of Heretics (Inquisito haeriticae pravitatis), later changed to the "Holy Office" (Sanctum Officium).


            Every man was compelled to spy on his neighbours.  Neglect of talebearing was in itself constructive heresy.  The "faithful" were to report any suspect, even though it were his own parent or child.  If a man was branded as suspect, the authorities would bring him in to "court"—dungeons equipped with instruments of torture.  Commoners, Cardinals, and royalty alike were subject to the court of inquisitors. 


            The smallest non-conformity could be magnified into a crime punishable by death.  Possessing a Bible in a mother tongue or even the wearing of garments disapproved by the authorities were crimes punishable by burning at the stake.


            Guilt was assumed unless he could prove his innocence.  The names of hostile witnesses were concealed, and advocates were forbidden to aid accused heretics.  Thus acquittals were almost unknown; the most that an accused could hope for was a verdict of "not proven." 


            The judges were purely ecclesiastical—the civil powers dared not even assert the right to consult the documents.  The procedure was secret, the records guarded jealously from all outsiders.


            During this time, laymen were forbidden to own Bibles—only the clergy could interpret the Scripture.  Church attendance was mandatory, but sermons were held exclusively in Latin, and dogma was decreed by the church. 


            Bible-believing Christians were "underground" for this reign of terror, hiding in mountains and in the wilderness, fleeing the persecution of the state church.


In the 16th century, men the likes of Martin Luther, Ulric Zwingli and John Calvin championed the search for Bible truth.  They protested Papal authority in doctrine, holding that the Bible alone was to be the ultimate standard of faith.  Thus was born the Protestant Reformation.


            At first, these men tried to reform within the church.  Men like John Huss remained loyal to the church, even as they were condemned to burn at the stake.  The reformers soon found out that reforming the church was impossible.  Study of Bible prophecy led each of these men to identify the mystic Babylon with the Roman church, and denounce the Papacy as the antichrist of Daniel and Revelation.


            Many of the great Christians of the reformation and post-reformation times shared this view of prophetic truth and identified the papacy as antichrist.  Among adherents of this interpretation were the Waldenses, the Hussites, Wyclif, Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Melancthon, the Baptist theologian John Gill, John Wesley, and the martyrs Cramer, Tyndale, Calimer and Ridley. 

 

 

JESUIT GENIUS


            Needless to say, the Papacy was not content to have the whole Protestant world, which was growing out of their control, pointing the finger at Rome.


            To counter the Reformer's interpretation of Daniel and Revelation, two Jesuit priests, Ribera and Alcazar, taught and expounded two opposing schools of interpretation, to nullify the Protestant belief—Futurism and Preterism.


            In 1590, Ribera published a commentary as a counter-interpretation to the prevailing view among Protestants.  The prophecies were all applied to the end of time, rather than to the history of the Church.  Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and rebuild Jerusalem, abolish Christianity, deny Christ, persecute the church and rule the world for three-and-one-half years (the "secret rapture" teaching came much later—around 1830).


In the early 17th century, Alcazar attempted to show that Revelation had no application to the future, but had its fulfillment way in the past.  Alcazar thus cleverly nullified the attacks upon the Roman Church which reformers had made so successfully by using the language of Revelation.


            So successful was the Jesuit agenda that the majority of the Protestant world today espouses not only facets of preterism, but a strict futurist interpretation.  They more than succeeded in their goal of diverting attention from Rome.


 

DANIEL'S SEVENTIETH WEEK


            It is a strictly futurist belief that there is a seven-year long tribulation.  They lift the seventieth week of Daniel's prophecy completely out of its context and shove it far into the future.  There is absolutely no Scriptural support for this; there is not even a hint in the text to indicate the separation of the seventieth week from the previous sixty-nine. 


            They agree that the sixty-nine weeks of Daniel 9:25 refers to the period before Christ's first advent, but then they insert a 2,000 year gap before the 70th week is fulfilled.  They allot 69 weeks plus 2,000 years plus 1 week, or a total of 2,490 years. 


            By this devious manipulation of God's word, they believe they have extended the Jewish probation.  Based upon this, they teach that all fleshly Jews will be saved in a great second chance after the "secret rapture" of all Christians takes place.


            The tragedy of this theory is that it takes the beautiful prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 that predicts the coming of Jesus, His baptism and crucifixion, and apply them to Antichrist!  They do this by stating that it is Antichrist that causes the sacrifices and oblation to cease, thus breaking his 7 year treaty ("covenant") with the Jews after only 3½ years.  This misinterpretation confuses something that Christ has done and applies it to the devil.

 


CONFUSING TWO PRINCES


            It is greatly due to not learning about the literary structure of Daniel 9:24-27 that futurists today can teach that something very important will be done against God's saints in the future by Antichrist, that was actually done for them nineteen-hundred years ago by Jesus Christ.


            The Hebrew people loved their language.  Their greatest prophets were great poets.  Even when not strictly writing poetry, they often used five basic aspects of Hebrew literary style: 1) Synonymous parallels, 2) antithetical parallels, 3) synthetic parallels, 4) alternating parallels and 5) "chiasms", a very complex structuring of the text (for a description and examples of these, see God Cares pp. 211-219 by C. Mervyn Maxwell).


            The theme of Daniel (and the whole of Scripture, for that matter) is the Great Controversy between Christ and Satan over the character and government of God.  Thus, the seventieth week contrasts the two princes in the conflict: "Messiah the Prince" (v 25), and the "prince" whose people would destroy the city and the sanctuary (v 26).  Ignorant of Hebrew style, it is not surprising that even honest Bible students have confused the two princes and assumed that they were one and the same.  But when we lay out the passage according to the laws of Hebrew literary style, we can instantly differentiate two separate princes.  The two princes and their work are contrasted with an "A-B, A-B" manner.  The "A" sections of verses 25-27 promise a Messiah Prince, and the "B" sections warn of a desolator prince.        

 

 

 

The Amazing Seventy Week Prophecy

 

“From the going forth of the command to restore and re-build Jerusalem (457 BC) until Messiah” shall be 69 weeks (483 years)

“The street shall be built... and the wall” finished “in troubleous times” (408 BC), 62 weeks (434 years) before the coming of the Messiah, who would then be “cut off”

 

 

 

 

“Messiah” means “anointed.” Jesus was anointed in 27 AD by the Holy Spirit at his baptism, 69 weeks after the decree was issued

“In the middle of the week” the Messiah was “cut off,” puttin an end to animal sacrifices

“70 weeks are deter- mined for your people and for your holy city.” The gospel began to go to the Gentiles in 34 AD after the stoning of Stephen